Wxxxxxxx . . . You are the weakest link . . . . Goodbye
FFFFFFFF Eeeeee Limited Eeeeeee NI . . Play the Weakest Link. See if you can spot Wxxxxxxx Nnnnnnn Kxxxxxxx.
So which one of you isn’t earning enough and does a lot of little deals on the side? . . . Which one of you likes to buy properties with disputes and then denies them? . . Which one of you employs useless crooked solicitors? . . . . Which one of you has risked bringing the good name of this Company into disrepute? . . .
Coming soon..
I’m an Accountant Please Get Me Out of This
Deal or no Deal. (Play Your Cards Right Special.)
What the Lawyers did for Us.
Countdown (Crooks edition)
Stir Crazy, The Porridge Episode.
CSI Croydon (is Crap edition)
Opportunity Kxxxxxxx.
FFFFFFFF Eeeeee NI
The Winner gets a Bentley Turbo courtesy of the MCP Law ‘granneyrobber’ scheme . (see below) . . . . the loser leaves with . . . NOTHING
More Dirty Tricks from MCP Law (well extortion . . actually.)
You always expect them to charge extortionate fees . . But you don’t expect them to actually commit to extortion do you?
DAN J GINSBURY’S STUPID TOSSER SOLICITOR Page @ IWG.org Click Here
MCP Law dot Org stats take this site to major league status. Overtaking many of my other sites. . . Click here
Live the high life see what it’s like to be a Solicitor at MCP. Read the Metcalfe Copeman Pettefar granny robber story . . Click logo
2006
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
DISCLAIMER . . Click here
My claims made on this and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman
& Pettefar ( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should
have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure
of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss
Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but
they have declined. It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions
that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the
opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it
that is.
In fact the reason they didn’t refute them . . . is they were true. Lisa Richardson
DID Conspire to Defraud.
Their clients DID NOT buy the property at AUCTION and they
DID know about the dispute when they AGREED to buy the property. In fact they bought
the property BECAUSE of the dispute. . . . All this has been sworn to under OATH
by Jonathan Burton Solicitor at MCP. . . . But he calls it . . . . “Was not meant
to deceive.”
2006
2008
NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers
and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR OLD but
more likely 2 years, and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution in ANY form under UK
Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats of legal action.
.They will just be ‘trying it on’..Besides it’s ALL true otherwise they would have
sued me. Google search defamation limitation.Pre-
